FLY Agentic UX — Lamonte’s Design Decisions

Decision A

Architecture Approach

The most important decision — determines the entire build approach.

Option A: Guided Coaching Agent

Interactive workbook with daily practices, progressive module unlock, artifact creation. 3-4 weeks. Highest fit to 30-day journey.

Recommended

Option B: Knowledge Q&A Hybrid

ChatGPT-style Q&A about FLY content. Extend Ask Zuzu. 1-2 weeks. Fastest but least differentiated.

Option C: Full ACE Framework

Deep transformation tracking, passive behavioral detection, evolution metrics. 6-8 weeks. Highest ceiling.

Decision B

Primary User

Build for end users (30-day journey) or facilitators (coaching tool), or both?

End users first, facilitators Phase 2

Build for the 30 enrolled members. Facilitator Training (31 lessons, DRAFT) comes later once validated.

Recommended

Facilitators first (coaching tool)

Build for FLY facilitators. Helps coaches deliver the program. Requires DRAFT content to be published first.

Both simultaneously

Dual-mode agent: end-user journey + facilitator coaching tool. Most ambitious, longest timeline.

Decision C

Brand Integration

Share HHE infrastructure or build standalone?

Shared HHE infrastructure

FLY products already mapped in HHE config. Reuse proxy-chat, Supabase, tier system. Faster launch.

Recommended

Separate standalone application

Independent deployment. Full brand control. Higher cost, longer setup, separate maintenance.

Decision D

Content Access Tier

Currently Neuro Wellness is FREE (30 members). Should the AI coaching companion remain free?

Student tier (paid)

Any paid user gets access. Aligns with tier refactor. Monetizable.

Recommended

Member tier (free)

Keep accessible to all enrolled members. Broadest access, no new revenue.

Premium add-on

Separate paid product specifically for the AI coaching companion. Highest revenue potential.

Decision E

Content Availability

This is the critical path. Without transcripts, the agent has no knowledge to draw from.

Transcripts exist now

Auto-generated or manually transcribed. Ready for immediate ingestion.

Need to create transcripts

No transcripts yet. Provide video files or access for AI auto-transcription (Whisper). Adds 1-2 weeks.

Partial availability

Some lessons transcribed, others need creation. We can start with what exists.

Decision F

MVP Scope

How much of the 30-day journey do we build first?

First 10 days

Covers onboarding, daily rhythm, key concepts (Archetypes, M.A.P.’s). If it works for 10 days, it scales to 30.

Recommended

Full 30-day journey

Complete experience from Day 1 to Day 30 + bonus. Highest impact, longest build.

Onboarding + Days 1-3

Minimal slice. START HERE + 3 modules. Fastest demo but may not show journey arc.

Decision G

Timeline Target

When should the MVP be live?

ASAP (align to content availability)

Start immediately. MVP timeline depends on transcript availability (3-4 weeks after content).

Recommended

Q2 2026 (April-June)

More deliberate timeline. Allows for content preparation, design iteration, and beta testing.

No specific date

Quality over speed. Build when content and design are right.

Decision H

Live Cohort Integration?

Should the AI companion support group dynamics or solo journeys only?

Solo async first, cohort Phase 2

Individual coaching experience. Group sessions and shared reflection walls come later.

Recommended

Cohort-aware from the start

Group journeys where participants can see shared progress. More complex but builds community.

Both modes available

Users choose solo or cohort mode. Most flexible, most complex to build.