M&J × noboxAI — Discovery Capture
Call outcome documentation for the Gemini Enterprise enablement opportunity
Call:
March 20, 2026 •
Attendees:
Benjamin Ellis (CIO), Brandon Smith, Skip Blankley, Jonathan Gatlit
Capture Progress
0 of 6 complete
Decision 1 of 6
What is M&J's most pressing technology challenge?
Based on what Ellis shared during discovery, which pain point resonated most strongly?
Post-merger platform unification
3 firms on different systems, 19+ offices, heterogeneous collaboration tools
Talent productivity / doing more with less
Can't hire fast enough, need to multiply existing capacity
Client service modernization
Technology as competitive differentiator in client delivery
Cybersecurity and compliance
Regulatory pressure, governance gaps post-merger
Other / unexpected priority
Something we didn't anticipate — document in notes below
Decision 2 of 6
What is the current state of Google Workspace Gemini?
Based on what was shared about their current technology stack and AI usage.
Not activated / not aware of Gemini
Have Workspace but Gemini features are not turned on
Activated but minimal adoption
Licenses exist but no formal enablement or training
Some power users, no formal program
Individual experimentation without organizational strategy
Active rollout already underway
Formal program exists — our role would be augmentation
Not on Google Workspace
On Microsoft 365 or mixed — changes the entire approach
Decision 3 of 6
Where should a pilot deployment focus?
Did Ellis indicate a preferred group, or should our assessment recommend one?
Audit teams
High document volume, standardized workflows, government/municipal audit strength
Tax teams
Research-heavy, deadline-driven, high client communication volume
Advisory / consulting
Client-facing, proposal-heavy, technology services practice
Administrative / operations
Email, scheduling, reporting — lowest risk, fastest visible wins
Let our assessment recommend
Ellis prefers data-driven recommendation over gut feel
Decision 4 of 6
What is the timeline signal?
Based on Ellis's language about urgency and next steps.
Immediate — wants to start within 30 days
"Send me a proposal" / "Let's get started"
Near-term — evaluating, decision by end of Q2
"This is interesting, let me think about it" / "What would a proposal look like?"
Planning phase — roadmap building, H2 execution
"We're still figuring out priorities" / "Maybe later this year"
Exploratory — just learning what's possible
"I'm gathering information" / No commitment language
Decision 5 of 6
What is the decision process?
Who else needs to approve, and what's the procurement path?
Ellis decides independently
CIO has budget authority for this scope
Ellis recommends, Managing Partner approves
Hanson Borders or executive committee has final say
Committee or board approval needed
Formal procurement process with multiple stakeholders
Unclear — didn't surface on call
Need to ask in follow-up
Decision 6 of 6
What was the agreed next step?
What did we commit to at the end of the call?
Send assessment proposal within 48 hours
Strong signal — Ellis wants to see scope and pricing
Schedule follow-up call
Interested but wants to bring in additional stakeholders or go deeper
Ellis will review internally and get back
Moderate signal — needs to socialize with leadership
Send info / materials for review
Educational phase — no commitment yet
No clear next step
Need to follow up proactively via Brandon
Open Capture
Key Quotes & Observations
Capture Ellis's exact words on pain points, any surprising insights, competitive mentions, or budget signals.
Generate Summary
Copy to Clipboard
Discovery Capture Summary
Copied to clipboard